What’s different about Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine that might explain its blood clot risk?
Why might some COVID-19 vaccines pose a small risk of blood clots while others don’t? Scientists suspect it’s related to their use of adenoviruses.
Why do some COVID-19 vaccines seem to pose a small risk of blood clots and others don’t? Scientists suspect it’s related to the way the vaccines are designed.
All three of the COVID-19 vaccines that have been authorized for use in the U.S. by the Food and Drug Administration — one from Pfizer and BioNTech, one from Moderna and one from Johnson & Johnson — teach the immune system to recognize the coronavirus without exposing the body to the real thing.
Here’s a breakdown of all the places a person might go to get vaccinated in Santa Cruz County now that eligibility is...
The vaccines pull this off by showing the immune system the spike proteins that stud the coronavirus surface.
A spike protein on its own isn’t dangerous. But since it’s foreign, the immune system will develop antibodies against it. Then, if a vaccinated person encounters an actual coronavirus, those antibodies will be ready to neutralize the spike proteins — along with the rest of the virus particle they’re attached to.
Instead of injecting a person with a real-life spike protein, the vaccines deliver a recipe for making spike proteins inside the body. Human cells follow that recipe after immunization — a process that requires one dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and two doses of the Pfizer and Moderna offerings.
What really differentiates the J&J vaccine from the others is the vehicle it uses to deliver its genetic cargo. That vehicle is an adenovirus — a type of virus that can cause cold-like symptoms. The one J&J uses has been genetically modified so that it can’t copy itself and make people sick.
AstraZeneca’s two-dose COVID-19 vaccine — which is not authorized for use in the U.S. — also employs an adenovirus. And it also has been linked to a rare condition that causes blood clots.
To some experts, that looks like more than a coincidence.
“It’s plainly obvious to us already that what we’re seeing with [the Johnson & Johnson] vaccines is very similar to what we’re seeing with the AstraZeneca vaccine,” said Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA’s chief of drug evaluation.
As scientists dig into the possible ways an adenovirus could trigger a biological process that ends in a life-threatening blood clot, they will study the patients who have wound up with a clot after receiving either vaccine, Marks added.
So far, that unlucky group includes seven of the roughly 7.5 million people in the U.S. who got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and 44 of the people who received at least one of the 20.2 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine administered in Europe.
Officials at the European Medicines Agency, the drug regulator there, strongly suspect the AstraZeneca vaccine is responsible for the blood clots. The EMA said, however, the benefits of the vaccine still outweighed the risks. (That assessment also applies to the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, which the agency authorized in March but hasn’t yet put into widespread use.)
It’s too early for anyone to say with certainty that the blood clots experienced by those who received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine were caused by the shots themselves. U.S. officials have recommended a pause in use of the vaccine while investigators dig into the problem.
Scientists do have some clues about how a vaccine that uses an adenovirus could wind up triggering a rare blood clotting disorder.
Some of them believe the seven women may have suffered a condition called autoimmune thrombocytopenia. Usually, it happens because the immune system mistakenly attacks a patient’s blood platelets, the cells the body uses to form clots. Paradoxically, patients with the condition also develop dangerous blood clots in the brain, lungs, legs or abdomen.
A study of 11 patients in Europe who developed blood clots after getting the AstraZeneca vaccine found that all of them had high levels of antiplatelet factor 4 antibodies — a sign that they, too, might have had autoimmune thrombocytopenia.
Safety monitors have not heard of any cases of blood clots in people with low platelet counts after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines, which use mRNA technology instead of adenoviruses. The instructions for making the spike protein are encoded in messenger RNA and protected by a tiny ball of fat.
Times staff writer Melissa Healy contributed to this report.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.