Posted inPolitics & Policy

In state’s Prop 5, advocates see a path to better funding for affordable housing, roads and more

State Proposition 5 on the Nov. 5 ballot would lower the voter approval threshold for affordable housing and public infrastructure bonds. While its chances of passing statewide are unclear, the measure has strong support from public officials in Santa Cruz County who are trying to confront the area’s housing crisis and significant infrastructure needs driven by climate change-driven disasters. If it does pass, local housing advocates say it would make funding the creation of more affordable housing “a lot more doable.”

Posted inOpinion from Community Voices

Santa Cruz County’s local tax and bond measures all deserve support

Lookout politics columnist Mike Rotkin endorses all 13 of the local taxes and bonds on the ballot on Nov. 5. No one loves paying, he writes, but the combination of 1978’s Proposition 13 and the current tax structure that gives breaks to corporations at the expense of homeowners is to blame. Local cities need more money to provide services, he writes.

Posted inOpinion from Community Voices

Big Soda’s ads on Santa Cruz’s Measure Z fail to tell the full story

Dr. John Maa, chair of the California Advocacy Committee of the American Heart Association, and Sabrina Adler of nonpartisan nonprofit ChangeLab Solutions write that voters deserve to know the facts about what the beverage industry is doing to thwart the democratic process in relation to local taxes on sugary drink distributors – as Santa Cruz’s Measure Z seeks to implement.

Posted inOpinion from Community Voices

Vote no on Measure U – use common sense and read the impartial analysis of consequences for SLV Water

Measure U makes no sense, writes Nancy B. Macy, a 50-year resident of Boulder Creek. The measure asks voters in the San Lorenzo Valley Water District to reverse a recent water bill hike and cap future charges. Macy sees the measure as shortsighted and foolish and against all the advice of experts. “Was the structure of the rate increase responsible? Thoughtfully designed by experts? Legally adopted? Is the rate increase necessary and was it carefully considered with public input and adapted to customer needs? Yes, yes, yes and yes!” she writes, while urging a no vote.

Sign up for newsletters

Get the best of Lookout Santa Cruz directly in your email inbox.

Sending to:

Gift this article