Posted inPolitics & Policy

In the Public Interest: Lookout forums continue, Measure M for Maybe, what mountain voters want

In his weekly newsletter covering Santa Cruz County politics and policy, Christopher Neely previews a pair of Lookout election forums this week, digs into what Measure M might and might not mean, talks to voters in the Santa Cruz Mountains about what they’re looking for in their new District 5 county supervisor and more.

Posted inOpinion from Community Voices

Measure M: We need to trust voters to decide about building heights

Retired urban planner Frank Barron makes the case for Santa Cruz’s ballot Measure M. “The voters should be allowed to have a say when developers want to build high-rises taller than the already generous height limits under current zoning,” he writes. He refutes arguments against M by progressive economist Richard McGahey, who studies cities and equality and is a senior fellow at the New School’s Schwartz Center.

Posted inPolitics & Policy

Roads, climate, mental health, CZU rebuild fuel county supervisor hopefuls in Districts 2 and 5 during forum

In Lookout’s first candidate forum of the 2024 election season, those who would represent South County and the Santa Cruz Mountains discussed road maintenance, climate change response, improved mental health facilities and cutting red tape to speed recovery from 2020’s CZU fire. The primary election is set for March 5.

Posted inPolitics & Policy

What you need to know from the high-stakes U.S. Senate debate

The four leading candidates for Dianne Feinstein’s former U.S. Senate seat faced off for the first time Monday. Democrats Barbara Lee, Katie Porter and Adam Schiff clashed over earmarks and the Gaza war, then ganged up on Republican Steve Garvey over his support for former President Donald Trump. But will the debate change the dynamics of the race before the March 5 primary?

Posted inOpinion from Community Voices

Measure M will make housing affordability in Santa Cruz worse

Economist Richard McGahey, who has held federal, state and local leadership roles and is regarded as a national expert on urban and regional economic development, is against March ballot Measure M. The part-time Santa Cruz resident says Measure M will mean less affordable housing for Santa Cruz and less housing justice for the community. Research, he says, proves his point. It shows that voters who show up for votes outside of regular election cycles are “whiter — and wealthier — than their communities as a whole. And they tend to oppose housing development, perhaps in part to protect their existing house values.”

Posted inOpinion from Community Voices

Propaganda or propaganda? Yet another response to Santa Cruz’s dangerous and senseless ballot Measure M

“If you run around crying ‘fire’ through the neighborhood after the fire department has already put out the fire, you are probably unnecessarily scaring people. One might even call that a ‘scare tactic,’” Don Lane writes in his latest piece decrying the upcoming Santa Cruz ballot initiative Measure M and refuting its chief proponent, Frank Barron, a retired environmental planner.

Sign up for newsletters

Get the best of Lookout Santa Cruz directly in your email inbox.

Sending to:

Gift this article